Through Halting a Harsh Tory Welfare Policy, This Budget Clearly Sets Out How Labour Will Wage the Struggle to Renew Britain
Just recently, the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, delivered a Labour budget. People have been calling for Labour’s mission and values to be more clearly articulated. Through the decisions made – a shift to a more equitable tax system, focusing on wealth to pay for tackling child poverty, good public services and the cost of living – we have unequivocally set out what we believe in.
That’s why Labour MPs cheered in the Commons, and it’s why we are up for the fights to come. And it’s why the cries from the right began right away.
The Central Political Divide in British Politics
The central dividing line in British politics is once again on the economy. On the one hand Labour, who want to change it so it helps ordinary working people, and on the other, our political opponents, who favor the status quo and the unsuccessful doctrine of the past. We must now take on, and prevail in, the argument.
The Tories had 14 years to resolve things and instead, by any measure, they got much worse. Their doctrinaire austerity and supply-side economics – tax cuts for the wealthy, reducing investment (leaving us with low productivity and wages), and failing to support young people after the pandemic – proved ineffective.
Record of Failure Under the Former Government
Living standards dropped by the biggest amount since records began, child poverty reached record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest on record, wages remained flat, a housing crisis took hold, young people affected by Covid were abandoned. The history of failure continues.
A single budget alone can’t fix everything, so Labour has a comprehensive plan for rebuilding and for restructuring the country. And we have to go out and keep making the case for why our approach will reap dividends.
Social Security and Child Poverty
Under the Tories, welfare spending significantly increased. As did child poverty, because they didn’t address the underlying issues: low pay, high housing costs, significant inequalities in education, health and regions. The state ends up paying more to manage the effects instead of the cure.
It’s why we are building more affordable homes than for a generation, raising wages and enhanced protections for workers, massively boosting investment in infrastructure and new industries, reducing waiting lists down and lowering the costs of childcare and energy as we pursue clean power.
Ending the Two-Child Benefit Cap
It’s also why we are absolutely right to use this budget to lift the two-child benefit cap.
For eight long years, since it was enacted, poorer families with children have suffered from a unjust social experiment that was branded as fair for working people when it was anything but. Most of the families impacted by it have a parent in work.
It has only served to push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, in the end, costs us more, as well as being callous and unethical.
Tangible Effects in Local Areas
From experience from my own constituency – where over 5,000 children will be raised out of poverty as a result of abolishing the cap – the real impact it’s had. Children wearing low-cost wellies as school shoes, children going to bed hungry and cold, living in cramped, damp homes, parents this Christmas relying on food banks for a simple meal or small gift for their kids.
I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already overburdened but have to divert time and resources to supporting children who are living with the consequences of deep poverty.
Lasting Consequences of Youth Hardship
Just one in four pupils from the poorest families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with almost 75% among wealthier families. This sets them up for the challenges they face throughout their lives: unrealized potential, economic struggles and ill health. Children who were raised in poverty are more likely to be jobless or poor as adults.
Addressing child poverty isn’t just a ethical duty, it is a long-term investment. Poverty costs the economy significantly more than the three billion pound cost of lifting the two-child cap, or extending free school meals.
This is the reason we acted urgently in the budget, despite the very difficult economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees over a hundred additional children pushed into poverty. The effects of lifting it won’t happen overnight either, so taking early action in the parliament was crucial.
The cap was a symbol to 14 years of failed rightwing ideology. Now it is abolished.
Fair Financing for Measures
We, as Labour, can also be clear that these measures are being funded in a fair way – from a new gaming tax, closing tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”.
Final Thoughts
Fairness and direction – that’s how we will succeed in the battle of ideas. This budget is a definitive statement that we gained the election as Labour, and will govern as Labour. As I consistently said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must reclaim the political megaphone and define the narrative more forcefully about what’s really wrong with the country and how we are repairing it. We’ve definitely done that this week.
So let’s maintain it and prevail in this fight about how we will renew Britain and tackle the deep inequalities impeding progress.